Research and Operational Analysis
Our risk models are built on top of government land-records programs, judicial precedent, and policy research — not assumptions. Below is the primary research informing the Title Risk Score, alongside what we're researching ourselves.
Fragmentation in Karnataka's Land Records
As of late 2023, computerization of Record of Rights had been completed in over 95% of villages nationally under DILRMP — yet digitization and verification remain two different things, which is the gap LREIX's scoring model sits in.
Source: Department of Land Resources →Karnataka's Shift from Registration to Verification
A 2025 Karnataka High Court ruling held that the Additional Registrar of Cooperative Societies has the legal authority to cancel registered sale deeds originating from illegal cooperative-society allotments — direct evidence that "registered" no longer means "safe" in Karnataka.
Source: BookNewProperty →Non-Revenue Land Risk in Bengaluru
Internal research track, in progress. Reference source for the underlying spatial data: Karnataka State Remote Sensing Applications Centre (KGIS).
Source: KGIS Karnataka →Why Presumptive Titling Creates the Need for a Score
India's presumptive title system places the burden of verifying ownership validity on the buyer, not the government, and while land records in over 90% of villages show as computerized, many haven't been properly updated — the structural reason title risk scoring exists at all.